Gimme Shelter

This week I travelled to Northampton with a few of the BOI Records boys and Darren (aka Tiny Cinema) for a show at a Hawaian bar (of which I am constantly forgetting the name).

Outside the venue I saw a homeless man wrapped up tightly in a duvet, on a matress, reading a dictionary. It was freezing, and raining on and off, and the scene completely broke my heart. I was visibly shaken, and I didn't really know what to do. My instinct was to go and offer money, but the guy hadn't asked for money, so I feared I may cause offence. If I'd have had something more stimulating than a dictionary then I would have given that to him, but unfortunately I didn't.

Being homeless must literally be the worst thing outside a serious illness that a person can go through. I get so angry when people say "oh I don't give money - they'll only spend it on booze". Yeah? Wouldn't you if you were sleeping on the street? I bloody would. And it's remarkable how many people say that whilst they're on a night out... getting pissed.

I decided in the end that I should donate something to Shelter. Maybe money, maybe time. And I think everyone in the label felt we should do something in the future, as a label, to help contribute to the good work they do.

Whilst thinking over the nights events, my mind wandered to two local 'tramps' in my home town of Hinckley.

First there is "Geoff the Irish Tramp". He is somewhat of a celebrity in Hinckley and even has his own facebook page.

The story goes that Geoff is not actually a drunk, but was once a great boxer. Unfortunately he took one too many blows to the head and is now "punch drunk". They say he has a house, and a wife, but she kicks him out during the day and lets him back in at night.

I like to think this is true, but I'm not sure it is.

I have had many a great conversation with Geoff. Once, he shouted at me "I don't owe you anything! You're not my mother! Go back to where you came from!", he also once asked "Are you Mike Tyson? I wouldn't like to be his undertaker - couldn't find a coffin big enough for the bugger!" and also used the greatest line ever used to start a conversation; "What about that other planet then eh?".

The second of Hinckley's tramps is Colin. Colin is always, without fail, wearing a suit, a corsage and is always saying he is late for a wedding.

Colin's story is the saddest thing I have ever heard. They say that he was on his way to his wedding when his wife to be was killed in a car crash. From that moment on he has been caught in a perpetual 'groundhog day' where he is always travelling to his wedding, that he will never arrive at.

Colin doesn't say a lot. He is not popular like Geoff. People avoid him.

People don't choose for these things to happen to them. If you give to one charity, give to Shelter.

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 4 days ago

The 3 stages of man... if man were mobile phone users.

Stage 1 - The teenager

YEEERRRRR BLUDZ I IZ GOT MAD SKILLZ ON TEH WEBZ N SHIZ. CHEK OWT MA FONE! HAZ GOT SUM MAD SPKRZZZ! BOOM BOOM BOOM LISTN TO DEM BEATZZZ!!!

Stage 2 - The adult

Oh, hello, I use my phone primarily for communication, perhaps the odd game here and there, maybe a bit of web browsing. It is not, however a ghettoblaster or an extension of my penis.

Stage 3 - Blackberry/iPhone owners

Hey! HEY! Have you seen my Blackberry/iPhone? You must have. You MUST have. I've had it out for the last 2 hours. Look at it. Look at my Blackberry/iPhone. F*CKING LOOK AT MY F*CKING BLACKBERRY/IPHONE. You want one don't you? DON'T YOU? YOU LOSER WITH YOUR LOSER NOKIA. THERE'S NO "APP FOR THAT" IS THERE!?!? MUAHAHAHAHAHA!! Touch me.

And there ends today's lecture.

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 2 months ago

ZOMGZ! It's my personal history of the internet! LOL!

Ah Windows 95, you beautiful freak, I do love you so. For it was you who was there with me as I first took steps into the internet, like a cloud filled pied piper leading me into the darkest depths of the world wide web.

For me, the internet started when my parents purchased a new PC that had W95 on it, and with that came Internet Explorer. This coincided with the release of Freeserve's (now Orange) 'pay as you go' internet package.

Imagine that now - paying as you go for usage of the internet. That would stop music piracy pretty quickly!

Of that time, I remember three websites standing out for me: Yahoo Chat, Mp3.com, and an IP address that was passed round school that linked to free hardcore porn.

Maybe I'll leave that third one and concentrate on the first two.

ASL? LOL :)

Before Facebook, Twitter and MySpazz, there were chat rooms. And in those chat rooms we chatted. And all the world was ablaze with debate. Topics such as "Clearly pop-punk is better than metal" and "Clarissa from 'Clarissa Explains It All' is WELL fit" flowed seamlessly like rivers of knowledge from the mouths of Gods.

Oh and everyone was 14. Apart from the paedophiles.

Then this odd trend of 'online girlfriends/boyfriends' happened.

I had one myself. Her name was Rosie, and she looked like this:

In my head.

In real life, she probably looked like this:

I know I did.

She wanted to meet up once, but that is simply NOT HOW I ROLL, instead she met up with a mate of mine, and they got on a treat, leaving me behind.

I never did meet her.

I AM A ROCK GOD

Anyone who ever speaks to me about music online will be punching themselves in the face at the mere mention of MP3.com. That's how much I go on and on and on about it, but I don't care, because I bloody LOVED mp3.com, and I always will.

Before Myspace, Purevolume, Reverbnation (insert endless list here), there was mp3.com. Imagine a website where you put in the name of a popular band, and a list of unsigned or smaller bands who sound like that band comes up for you to listen and download. But, imagine that in a world that is pure. A world that has not been tainted by SEO, "online marketing experts" and "social media strategies". Where bands want their music to be heard, and they tell the truth.

It was a beautiful place without discrimination. Music flowed freely and bands were discovered and loved. I put my own band up there, and on one glorious day in June, we held the number 3, 4 and 7 positions in the 'grunge' chart.

It was a simpler time that I will always miss.

Where are we now?

Well, I'd argue I use the internet no differently to how I used it before. Chat rooms have simply been replaced my Twitter and Facebook, the online girlfriend has been replaced by 'online contacts', and mp3.com has been replaced by a billion different music sites where I discover and share music.

That naughty IP address doesn't work any more though. And for that, I am eternally sad.

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 2 months ago

Rivers Cuomo - from geek rock underdog to corporate rock whore

See that?

That's a graph showing Weezer frontman Rivers Cuomo's 'tweets' per month. Up until September Cuomo was, at best, an infrequent user of social networking site twitter, occasionally posting the odd tweet in Japanese, or declaring his love for Soccer.

All good, until October, one month before the scheduled release of Weezer's new album 'Raditude', when Cuomo's tweets leapt to 200 per month from 40 per month. Only a 500% increase then. Nothing for us to get cynical about there.

I follow Cuomo, and this increase in activity was so obvious, so calculated, that I didn't need a graph to tell me what was going on.

What really gets to me, what really grates, is that this behaviour is indicative of what Weezer have become as a band.

Early albums Weezer (Blue album) and Pinkerton became alt-rock classics due to raw open lyrics sang with classic pop melodies over thick, layered guitars. It became the mid 90s alt-rock blueprint.

And it sold. Because it was real.

Kids like me related to it. Rivers couldn't quite hit the notes, but hey, neither could I. Rivers never quite got the girl, but hey, neither did I.

The last two Weezer albums, Make Believe and Red, have been anything but 'real'. They have been calculated moves in order to sell records. Videos featuring Hugh Hefner, references to internet 'memes' to create a 'viral' vide, pointless nonsense lyrics that would never offend the retailers nor excite a listener.

No heart, no songs, no point.

Which brings us right back to the leap in twitter posts - A calculated move to increase interest ahead of a record release.

Well done Rivers, I'm sure you've made the record label very happy, but as with your recent musical output this only serves to alienate a former die hard fan even further.

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (2)
Posted 3 months ago

WAR! HUH! GOOD GOD! WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR? (reducing the dynamic range of an audio signal in order to achieve a consistent volume throughout)

First of all watch this:

That's pretty much the concept of audio compression. You make the quiet bits of a piece of audio louder to reduce the difference in amplification between the loud bits and the quiet bits. Audio compression is used all the time in music production, and is not an evil practice. Usually it is completely justified and necessary. It helps to provide a thick guitar tone, or give the snare drum a real 'THWACK'. The problem arises during the mastering process.

Mastering is when rather than editing and adding effects to individual instruments, and entire completed piece of music (often known as a 'mixdown') is edited as a sole entity. This is done to ensure a consistent level of volume, EQ, and overall sound across a collection of audio, eg. an album.

There has been a tendency in recent years for mastering engineers to make everything as loud as possible, and they use audio compression to do this, increasing the volume of the quiet bits so that there is almost no difference in volume between the "quiet" bits and the "loud" bits. The reason they do this is simple: Radio, specifically car radio. If you are driving in your car and a song comes on that certain parts are hard to hear, you probably won't get the full impact of that song, so the mastering engineers (probably instructed by the labels) make sure that every part is as loud as possible so that you'll never miss a beat when cruising to McDonalds.

Of course... this is ridiculous. When a radio broadcasts a song, they KNOW that this happens, so they already compress the audio signal to death as it is broadcast, so there is absolutely no need for this over compression to take place before hand.

Several albums have recently been released that take the loudness war to a ridiculous conclusion. The Flaming Lips' 'At War With The Mystics' verges on the unlistenable due to the levels of distortion created by over compression (although, one may not be out of line to suggest that Wayne Coyne and Co would be attracted to such an end result). Metallica have also been ripped to shreds for their addition to the loudness war 'Death Magnetic', but at least they sorted out the snare sound that plagued St Anger.

There is now a wide ranging movement amongst sound engineers to fight against the loudness war.

For thoughts on the subject that are far more educated than mine, read Ian Shepherd's blogs.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  Music Online  
Comments (0)
Posted 3 months ago

Sneakernet

The concept of sneakernet is the use of digital distribution, through physical means. This could be anything from USB pens to CD Roms containing digital media files.

One of the more famous uses of Sneakernet was by Nine Inch Nails main man Trent Reznor. In 2007, prior to the release of Year Zero - Reznor's final release on major label Interscope - fans at Nine Inch Nails concerts found various USB sticks hidden around the concert containing unreleased songs from the forthcoming album. This tactic created buzz and excitement amongst the fans as well as garnering attention from a music press hungry for 'the next solution' in the music industry's search for new ways to engage and sell to fans.

American band The Mars Volta took this one step further by releasing an entire album on USB stick. The Bedlam In Goliath was released in 2008 and included an option to purchase the album on a specially designed USB stick. The flash drive also provided access to unreleased content such as videos, unreleased tracks and B sides.

As far as I can see this tactic is somewhat of a gimmick, and can only really be successfully employed by established artist who has the fan base and the budget to pull off such a maneuver (USB discs far out weigh the cost of traditional alternatives such as CDs).

One avenue I could see that may work is a record label, or distributor, striking a deal with a USB manufacturer that would include new USBs being manufactured with a copy of an artist's album, or several albums by several artists, pre loaded on to the USB stick. This tactic could also be applied to other digital technologies such as MP3 players. However, the downside of this tactic is that most people who buy a USB stick or MP3 player do so to put their own content on to it rather than receive content from someone else.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  Music Online  
Comments (0)
Posted 3 months ago

Hmmm... I'll take it in a medium please.

"The content of any medium is always another medium" - Marshall McLuhan, 1964

The above quote from McLuhan appears in his work Understanding The Media (1964) in which he goes on to clarify the statement: "The content of writing is speech, just as the written word is the content of print, and print is the content of the Telegraph". Fairly simple stuff, and when you start to think about it, it is very hard to come up with a piece of media that has not gone through this process; that has not gone through remediation.

Remediation is the process in which one medium is represented through another. Obvious examples are novels being turned into films. The film is a remediation of the original novel (although you could easily argue that the film is a remediation of the screen play, and the screen play is the remediation of the novel, but let's not go crazy).

Bolter and Grusin (1999) also state that remediation is a process through which technology evolves. We can see this clearly in the field of music. We had Vinyl, then 8 track, then cassette, then CD, then MiniDisc, then MP3, and now all manner of different digital audio encodes for the audiophiles in the room to play with. Is that Buddy Holly track any different? No, it is the same medium represented through all these different other mediums with different packaging and sound quality, and most importantly, a different experience. Putting an MP3 on your iPod will never have the same feel as putting a vinyl onto a turntable.

Speaking of vinyl, if we make reference to Oliver Carter's work on the obsolescence of the VHS, or rather the continued need for VHS in certain fan communities, we can see a similar trend with vinyl. Since the MP3 has taken over the world, there has been a significant rise in the purchase and collection of vinyl by a cult audience who are looking for that 'realness' that comes with owning a fully packaged product.

There are now vinyl turntables specifically designed to record vinyl straight to MP3. A most blatant example of remediation with the most 'up to date' and 'outdated' technologies combined.

I truly cannot argue with McLuhan's statement, however I do not see the statement as a negative. I think that it is a positive that these old technologies are absorbed and developed. It gives us a sense of history, and a sense of place in society.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  Interactive Cultures  
Comments (0)
Posted 3 months ago

Smoking vs Music

I'm subscribed to online music service emusic and receive 50 downloads for the sum of 11.99 a month.

Recently I decided to unsubscribe from the service as I am a filthy jobless student who is completely skint and can no longer afford such luxuries.

Today I had an epiphany - I must spend around £15-£20 a month on smoking tobacco and it's various related products. What is more important to me? Smoking or music?

Music. Everytime.

If this isn't a motivation enough to give up smoking then I don't know what is (Cancer? Whatever mate..).

Now all I need is a very very large supply of sugar free gum and some will power - I've quit for 6 weeks before cold turkey so I know I can do it.

Wish me luck

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  Personal  
Comment (1)
Posted 3 months ago

What all independent artists and labels dream of...

What would be the ‘all in one’, ultimate online web solution for independent artists and record labels?

I’ve spent years (see: decades) writing, playing and promoting music in one form or another, and I have always longed for the ‘one place’ where everything you could ever need to release your music would be available.

If we ignore the obvious features such as artist/label profile, gig listings, etc. There are many features that I believe such a site would comprise, and all of them are currently available by using one website or another separately. Therefore there is no reason that these features cannot be combined into one 'ultimate' site for independent music.

ALL INCLUSIVE digital distribution

Many sites offer digital distribution where you pay a set up/yearly fee and then pay per store from a (sometimes) fairly limited list to have your music distributed across the major web shops. There is a different service provided by CD Baby. You pay a set up fee to be a CD Baby artist ($35 - the same as most digital distribution services) and then CD Baby distributes your music to ALL of it's digital partners (unless you specify otherwise), even when they add new partners these are automatically included.

CD Baby take a small cut of sales from the distribution, however I would say this was more than fair for the service they offer.

Existing Website: CD Baby

Physical Distribution partners

Now, It may seem that through this post that I work for CD Baby in some sort of PR department, however it is simply the case that they come the closest to providing the solution that I am outlining. CD Baby have an agreement with American physical distributor Super-D meaning that when you sign up with CD Baby, your CD is available to over 2400 independent stores in the US as well as online stores such as CD Universe. This is possible because CD Baby hold stock of each artist's CD, numbers of which depends on sales of the CD in question. Again, CD Baby take a cut for this service.

In my opinion the UK is desperately missing this sort of service. It would only take an agreement with one independent distributor and the same service could easily be offered in this country. In fact, the major downside of CD Baby is that it is very US focused, however this only creates opportunity in the UK market.

Existing Website: CD Baby

Sell directly to the fans

Having your music on iTunes and your CDs in Amazon is great and all, but they take a cut of your money when you could just as easily sell directly to fans yourself.

Bandcamp offers what I would consider the cleanest and most efficient solution for selling or giving away digital audio (not just mp3s - Bandcamp offers a LOT of different audio types to download). No charge and you can even have your fans name their price for downloads.

CD Baby sells artists' CDs (of course, taking a cut), but although they do ship worldwide, this does entail the artist or label sending stock to America. Setting up as a business on Paypal (which is one of the options you could do to receive Bandcamp payments anyway) offers you the chance to embed simple 'buy it now' buttons onto a website enabling an artist or label to sell directly through their own site.

Another option is Big Cartel which I will look at next.

Existing Websites: Bandcamp, CD Baby, PaypalBig Cartel 

Merchandise

As discussed in this blog post there are two main ways to sell music merchandise - initial bulk orders that the artist/label sell themselves for a profit, or made to order merchandise. For the purposes of this section I will look at the idea of artists and labels selling their own merchandise as I will look in more depth at the made to order option later in this post.

One of the most popular sites on the internet for selling clothing and CDs is Big Cartel. The site offers fully integrated shop product page, shopping cart, and stock management. There is a sliding scale of features ranging from a basic free version up to a premium fully featured online shop.

Don't forget of course, that like CDs, Paypal offers solutions for integrating into existing websites.

Existing Websites: Big CartelPaypal

Made to order products

I've kept this separate from merchandise as there are also sites that offer made-to-order CDs. Digital distributor Tunecore recently partnered with one such service, Amazon's Createspace, to offer users a solution incorporating Digital distribution as well as potential worldwide availability of made to order CDs.

Lulu.com also offer made to order CD publishing, however their worldwide shipping costs mean they are no real match for Createspace when it comes to a distribution option.

Both Spreadshirt and Cafepress are leading websites when it comes to made to order merchandise. They offer all manner of merch, from T-shirts to wall clocks to dog coats.

Made to order products have the advantage of having little to no upfront cost, but the disadvantage of very low profit margins as the company has to recover their costs of making a one of product before any profit is passed on to the artist/label.

However, having both options; selling your own merchandise and physical music as well as made to order products, on one website would only serve to widen the appeal of such a service (imagine a 15/16 year old school band who cut a demo at a local studio. They know they could sell 100-200 CDs to the other kids in their school, but they have no way of affording the initial manufacture, and want better product than home made CDRs. They can just point their classmates to their site and start selling not only CDs, but T shirts, without any start up costs).

*NOTE* One of the first ever 'band mp3 websites', before myspace, purevolume, reverbnation and bandcamp, was mp3.com. As well as offering free or paid downloads of any artist's music via mp3, they also offered made to order CDs that could be ordered by the fans. I myself still have an mp3.com CD I bought from the site. I find it odd that this practice was somewhat forgotten as more and more websites for bands came into existence.

Existing Websites: Tunecore/Createspace, Lulu.com, Spreadshirt, Cafepress

Analytics/Widgets/Synchronisation

I've rather callously lumped these features together for two reasons. Firstly, this blog post would be huge otherwise, but also most sites that offer one, offer all of the above.

Reverbnation are the kings of the widget. They have widgets that are music players, that have all tour dates that an artist is playing (with optional map), picture widgets, video widgets, press review widgets, mailing list widgets, blog widgets. They even have a widget that is all of the above widgets in one widget. THE UBER WIDGET.

They also offer analytics as well as features enabling you to see where on the internet your act is being talked about. They also offer synchronisation, so that when you update your reverbnation it updates your twitter, myspace and facebook automatically (however having used this feature myself, it doesn't exactly do what it says on the tin).

As well as all of this Reverbnation offers digital distribution and the ability to link out to physical merchandise and music stores where an artist's product is available.

Existing sites: Reverbnation, Bandcamp, Band Metrics

* * * *

So along with CD Baby, Reverbnation come pretty damn close to what would be, in my opinion, the 'ultimate' site for musicians. However, they don't quite tick every box.

To tick every box on this list would take a lot of time, effort, and money, but if someone was to nail it then I can guarantee that every single small to medium music enterprise would want to be part of it, and you would make millions. And the big thing to remember is this: It is TOTALLY POSSIBLE. The websites listed above prove that, it is just a case of combining the technologies and the know how into a complete package.

What have I missed from this tool box? Who else offers similar solutions? Have I missed someone who offers it all? Am I completely wrong about all of this and this isn't what artists want at all?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  Music Online  
Comment (1)
Posted 4 months ago

The all new adventures of Podasaurus

I'm a bit of a dinosaur me. It's not just the scaled skin and my tendency to eat rocks in order to digest rough foliage; I always feel a year or two behind everyone else when it comes to new technology and media. I have a phone, ipod, laptop etc. but I wasn’t queuing outside Dixons on the days that each was launched.

It’s not that I don’t ‘get it’. I do. I really get it. The iPhone for example – I totally get it. It’s basically a fully blown laptop in your pocket with every conceivable feature and function available through open source developed apps. For me, this open source development is the present and future of what we call ‘new media’ on all levels. What’s not to get?

No, it’s not that I don’t get it, I just think I am dictated to by a question:  Do I need it?

In 1998 I got my first mp3 player aged 15, and I saved up and paid over £150 of my hard earned money to experience every single second of music I could fit onto 32MB of memory. At the time, that was top of the range, and I think it may have been the first and last time I ever bought something that was brand new and top of the range.

I asked myself the same question at the time – Do I need it? The answer? Yes. Hell Yes. My god I need that so much it’s not even funny.

You see, I’m obsessed with music, and 32MB afforded me around 2 hours of music at 96kbps (standard at the time) and 2 hours is 30 minutes more than the C90 tapes that I had been wearing out by playing them every day on the walk to school. With this 32mb I could create 2 hour mix tapes and change them at will without ever needing to crouch next to my stereo carefully hitting record and pause (a pleasure that I have ironically grown to miss).

This was brilliant. This was amazing. This was the future.

As I went on I would upgrade every year or so until I got to the point where I had an mp3 player that I could fit my entire music collection on. Then I stopped. I had reached the end. Why would I need to upgrade further? Every piece of music I own is now in my pocket, there is nowhere else to go when it comes to my personal needs.

So back to the iPhone; Do I want it? Yes. Do I need it? No, absolutely not
First of all, even the largest iPhone couldn’t handle my music collection. I could stop there, but also I already have a phone, and a laptop.

Maybe developments in the field of portable music and the iPhone app system, such as spotify’s recent launch, will lead me to change my answer to ‘Yes’. This prospect excites me to the point that I would take this as my main research interest within the field of new media.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  Interactive Cultures  
Comments (0)
Posted 4 months ago